#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE FULL#
#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE PC#
#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE PLUS#

Of course, this stuff is all about personal choice and personal taste, so if PTLE or PT M-Powered floats your boat, then run with it. We have a PTHD3 Accel rig at work and I would be lying if I didn't say that I liked mixing with it, given that we have Waves and McDSP TDM bundles, but PLTE/M=Powered are just not the same, the Mboxes are not great interfaces and even though the Profire 610 is a better than average M-Audio product, I would be looking at MOTU and RME and perhaps Echo Audio's products more preferentially.

#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE PLUS#

This plus the track limitations and the cost of adds ons are what really hamstring Protools native software. Not every plugin declares latency which means a lot of faffing about trying to calculate it manually. It is a pain in the ass, unless you recorded a band live and are not using effects, or are using the same effect on each track - and more to the point, stuff like Reaper costing 60 dollars has delay compensation, so why Digidesign steadfastly refuse to include it in their consumer line (PTHD does have it) is a mystery but most other DAWS have had it for the best part of 6 years. Driver support has been unquestionably poor in the past, hopefully they are now putting that right. The FW410 is still one of the most controversial of M-Audio's line because so many people have had issues with it, on the other hand everyone else has it working fine, there are no grey areas.

#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE PC#

I use Cubase for mixing - IMHO, Cubase 5 or Sonar 8PE on PC or Logic Studio 8 or DP6 on Mac are better options.ДЄs for M-Audio - many of their products are still seriously flawed and disappointing, but they seem to be improving a bit of late - the 610 is getting mostly good reviews and the EX66 monitors are top notch for a great price.

#M AUDIO PROFIRE 610 DRIVER UPDATE FULL#

There is STILL no plugin delay compensation, *major PITA*, track limitations (although increased to 48 from 32) and a lot of missing features compared to the full blown PTHD, especially video and syncing (OK, Live only has rudimentary features in this department too).

Live's mixer screen if you have a busy song with loads of tracks, but I would do my homework and really research if it's worth spending the money on PTLE/M-Powered. I get where you're coming from evernaut, esp. pop/folk/rock or whatever you'd peg something that sounds a bit like Wilco/Spoon/Neil Finn) but that's about it.Д«ut I really like this piece of gear and, considering M-Audio's rep on the audio interwebs, thought I'd give credit where it's due. I don't tend to post a lot on here.I chime in on some threads, usually about mics or songs and stuff (I use Live for making alt. But a big difference in overall performance - both of the other interfaces choked and fell to their knees at much higher latency settings. I've also been using the Apogee duet and an ESI 610 for comparison, and while the duet is slightly more accurate and open in the pre-amp dept., there's little to separate them sound-wise as far as faithful, natural converters go. I'm using it on a 2gHz 2g RAM Mac Mini with the latest OS X Leopard build. etc.the CPU was hitting about 70% and I was still at a latency of about 6ms. I've just been working on a mix comprising about 26 tracks of audio and 4 or 5 midi instruments.including a rewire to ing 2 compressors, reverbs and delays as sends, amp sims, soft synths etc. Aside from the very decent mic pre's, the i/o options and the expensive-sounding AD/DA converters.the performance I'm getting as far as latency/CPU drag with Live is nothing short of a revelation.

M audio profire 610 driver update